top of page

Sign In or Register

professional-team-collaborating-over-laptops-shar-2025-02-17-03-19-40-utc 2

OUR STORY

A LEGACY OF BEHAVIOURAL RISK INTELLIGENCE

Leveraging a 40-year history working directly with top-tier executive teams, we have built a next-generation behavioural model powered by a truly singular dataset.

This is not theory or conjecture. It is a proprietary collection of rich, longitudinal data that demonstrates clear causal links between specific top-team behaviours and tangible organizational failure points.

No other dataset of this depth and breadth exists anywhere in the world. It offers leaders an unparalleled opportunity to proactively transform their behavioural risk profile and secure a more resilient future.

A BEHAVIOURAL MODEL ROOTED IN THE REAL WORLD

This direct engagement with executive teams at the highest level created a real-world laboratory of leadership behaviour. The insight gained – how decisions are made, how teams function, and how leadership culture permeates entire organizations – became the foundation for what is now Behavioural Risk Intelligence®.

DRIVING CULTURAL TRANSFORMATION AT SCALE

ENHANCING STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP
 

DEVELOPING EXECUTIVE EXCELLENCE

Our inspiration comes from the pioneering work of Raeburn Keslake Associates (RKA). Founded in 1983, RKA became one of the most successful organisation development agencies of its time, specializing in:

Our methodology is built on a fusion of Behavioural Economics, Psychology, and advanced Data Science. We go beyond traditional risk models by uncovering the hidden behavioural drivers behind executive decisions and organizational dynamics.

PSYCHOLOGY EXPLAINS THE WHY BEHIND INDIVIDUAL AND TEAM ACTIONS.

BEHAVIOURAL ECONOMICS PROVIDES THE STATISTICAL AND DECISION-MAKING FRAMEWORKS

DATA SCIENCE TRANSLATES THESE INSIGHTS INTO QUANTIFIABLE, PREDICTIVE RISK MODELS.

THE SCIENCE BEHIND OUR WORK

This approach, combined with our unique longitudinal data, allows us to reveal not just symptoms but the causal architecture of organizational risk.

professional-team-collaborating-over-laptops-shar-2025-02-17-03-19-40-utc 2
professional-team-collaborating-over-laptops-shar-2025-02-17-03-19-40-utc 6

THE 13 ORGANISATIONAL FAILURE POINTS

When top-team behavioural risks go unchecked, they manifest in consistent, measurable outcomes.

We’ve identified 13 recurring failure points, including:

THE 13 ORGANISATIONAL FAILURE POINTS

When top-team behavioural risks go unchecked, they manifest in consistent, measurable outcomes.

We’ve identified 13 recurring failure points, including:

01.

THREAT RIGIDITY

Inability to evaluate complex challenges or adapt to change.

04.

EXPECTATION DISPARITY

Misalignment between promises and lived reality, eroding trust

07.

EMPLOYMENT LEGISLATION BREACH

Legal or regulatory violations.

10.

EXECUTION & DELIVERY FAILURE

Strategic promises falter in implementation.

13.

INTERNAL THEFT OR FRAUD

Misappropriation of assets or deliberate deception.

02.

MARKET / PRODUCT DISPLACEMENT

Misjudging evolving needs, leading to obsolete offerings.

03.

CHANGE EXECUTION FAILURE

Initiatives stall, derail, or fail outright.

05.

COMPLACENT CONTROL PRACTICES

Weak internal controls exposing the organization to risk.

06.

INEFFECTIVE EMPLOYEE RELATIONS

Breakdown of communication and collaboration.

08.

IMPROPER BUSINESS PRACTICES

Ethical lapses or deviation from compliance.

09.

UNREASONABLE SYSTEM DEMANDS

Leadership overloads systems, causing errors or outages.

11.

IMPROPER MARKET PRACTICE

Unfair or unethical conduct in the marketplace.

12.

UNAUTHORIZED ACTIVITY

Leaders bypassing controls, overstepping authority.

Each of these points is causally linked to identifiable executive behaviours. By pinpointing and addressing these risks at their root, organizations can intercept failure before it manifests.

Untitled.jpg
1 1

TAKE THE FIRST STEP

Turn hidden behavioural risk into strategic advantage

Let’s help you see what others miss. Behavioural Risk Intelligence® gives you the clarity and control you’ve been missing. The question isn’t if it will change your approach—it’s when.

bottom of page